Thread:Vizard6991/@comment-30035163-20170714171143

Sorry if this bothers you, and I hope you don't block me over this. I'm just trying to make sure everything is understood.

I'd like you to not mistake persistence for anger or upset. I feel you did not understand my reasoning the last time I took this issue up with you. Your warning also said nothing about continuing discussion on this matter, so I do not understand why you would block me.

I only went to Angelo because you closed discussion before we were actually finished with it. The way you brought up social media sites led me to believe you didn't understand what I was trying to do.

While I appreciate your willingness to compromise, your compromise simply didn't make any sense. It does not serve the same function as a source link, which is a useful tool for people who use wikis to help them locate specific resources and where other resources may be found. Such links have assisted me many times before.

A post on the forum doesn't help someone who is looking at the description of that specific image, and who would be glad to know a higher resolution one exists. Even if that image is too large to be posted directly to the wiki.

If you have any disagreement with my reasoning, or any statement I've made seems illogical, please let me know. I do not want there to be any misunderstandings, like in previous discussions with you.

If you do not personally care for or make use of source links, that is fine, but please don't make small edits unneccesarily difficult for me. Especially if you don't actually care too much about the issue, and it doesn't break any rules or guidelines.

If you are afraid of people posting ten links of different resolutions and no other significant differences, then just limit it to two. I can't see why anyone would ever need more than that.

Thank you for your time. 