Talk:Pandora/@comment-121.208.194.101-20200909120604/@comment-44261938-20200914194500

You never asked for an example of when that was mentioned, though. You weren't expressing your issues with the specific way in which Sasaki rewrote it, you were complaining that he changed it on basis of "assumptions".

Your previous comment also makes a bunch of mock assumptions in order to try and prove some point, but they fall flat.

Why did she kill Fortuna? Because she was the one to whom Emilia made the promise, and that promise was in the way of her goal, so she killed Fortuna to rid Emilia of the need to uphold that promise.

Why did she not kill Pete? Because he was now the Archbishop of Sloth and thus useful to her.